Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #19 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,653
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,550

LEVEL 1

4,027

38%

LEVEL 2

3,870

37%

LEVEL 3

2,024

19%

LEVEL 4

629

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,054
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,266

LEVEL 1

3,728

36%

LEVEL 2

3,484

34%

LEVEL 3

2,172

21%

LEVEL 4

882

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,572
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,076

LEVEL 1

1,570

31%

LEVEL 2

1,934

38%

LEVEL 3

1,153

23%

LEVEL 4

419

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,783
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,020

LEVEL 1

1,486

30%

LEVEL 2

1,751

35%

LEVEL 3

1,254

25%

LEVEL 4

529

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,081
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,474

LEVEL 1

2,457

45%

LEVEL 2

1,936

35%

LEVEL 3

871

16%

LEVEL 4

210

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,271
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,246

LEVEL 1

2,242

43%

LEVEL 2

1,733

33%

LEVEL 3

918

17%

LEVEL 4

353

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

20

51%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

309
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 766

LEVEL 1

199

26%

LEVEL 2

258

34%

LEVEL 3

198

26%

LEVEL 4

111

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

381
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

183

24%

LEVEL 2

209

27%

LEVEL 3

221

29%

LEVEL 4

160

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

91

46%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,003
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,752

LEVEL 1

1,949

41%

LEVEL 2

1,800

38%

LEVEL 3

801

17%

LEVEL 4

202

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,148
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,486

LEVEL 1

1,777

40%

LEVEL 2

1,561

35%

LEVEL 3

861

19%

LEVEL 4

287

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,244
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,673

LEVEL 1

1,742

37%

LEVEL 2

1,687

36%

LEVEL 3

960

21%

LEVEL 4

284

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,415
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,617

LEVEL 1

1,613

35%

LEVEL 2

1,589

34%

LEVEL 3

1,015

22%

LEVEL 4

400

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,471
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,668

LEVEL 1

2,109

28%

LEVEL 2

3,088

40%

LEVEL 3

1,857

24%

LEVEL 4

614

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,770
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,345

LEVEL 1

1,921

26%

LEVEL 2

2,654

36%

LEVEL 3

1,934

26%

LEVEL 4

836

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

182
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,882

LEVEL 1

1,918

67%

LEVEL 2

782

27%

LEVEL 3

167

6%

LEVEL 4

15

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

284
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,921

LEVEL 1

1,807

62%

LEVEL 2

830

28%

LEVEL 3

238

8%

LEVEL 4

46

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,597
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,314

LEVEL 1

3,147

34%

LEVEL 2

3,570

38%

LEVEL 3

1,971

21%

LEVEL 4

626

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,978
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,062

LEVEL 1

2,905

32%

LEVEL 2

3,179

35%

LEVEL 3

2,100

23%

LEVEL 4

878

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,236

LEVEL 1

880

71%

LEVEL 2

300

24%

LEVEL 3

53

4%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

76
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,204

LEVEL 1

823

68%

LEVEL 2

305

25%

LEVEL 3

72

6%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

423
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,335

LEVEL 1

438

33%

LEVEL 2

474

36%

LEVEL 3

320

24%

LEVEL 4

103

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

378
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 911

LEVEL 1

238

26%

LEVEL 2

295

32%

LEVEL 3

237

26%

LEVEL 4

141

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,230
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,215

LEVEL 1

3,589

39%

LEVEL 2

3,396

37%

LEVEL 3

1,704

18%

LEVEL 4

526

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,676
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,355

LEVEL 1

3,490

37%

LEVEL 2

3,189

34%

LEVEL 3

1,935

21%

LEVEL 4

741

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.