Skip to Content
Main content

MAGNET SCH OF MATH, SCI, DESIGN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

152

42%

LEVEL 4

104

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

72

19%

LEVEL 3

155

41%

LEVEL 4

121

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

60

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

76

39%

LEVEL 4

74

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

69

40%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

79

44%

LEVEL 4

47

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

60

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

88

48%

LEVEL 4

71

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

15

54%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

14

54%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

137

47%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

138

45%

LEVEL 4

118

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

24

32%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

27

41%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

253
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

103

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

272
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

151

42%

LEVEL 4

121

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

124

43%

LEVEL 4

93

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

39

14%

LEVEL 3

121

44%

LEVEL 4

105

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.