Skip to Content
Main content

PS 47 JOHN RANDOLPH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

236

42%

LEVEL 2

200

36%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

203

37%

LEVEL 2

206

37%

LEVEL 3

119

22%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

101

36%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

134

50%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

102

38%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

16

24%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

44

48%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

37

43%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

169

44%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

174

37%

LEVEL 2

179

38%

LEVEL 3

98

21%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

145

32%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

62

70%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

58

60%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

147

34%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

129
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

119

29%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

89

70%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

84

59%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

228

42%

LEVEL 2

195

36%

LEVEL 3

98

18%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

199

37%

LEVEL 2

199

37%

LEVEL 3

114

21%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.