Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 144 MICHELANGELO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

141

31%

LEVEL 2

202

45%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

103

47%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

93

40%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

128

44%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

63

46%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

176

51%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

74

68%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

52

54%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

124

29%

LEVEL 2

195

46%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

80

45%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

122

45%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.