Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST # 8 - BRONX GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,535
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,441

LEVEL 1

4,197

34%

LEVEL 2

4,709

38%

LEVEL 3

2,602

21%

LEVEL 4

933

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,320
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,577

LEVEL 1

4,046

32%

LEVEL 2

4,211

33%

LEVEL 3

2,975

24%

LEVEL 4

1,345

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,028
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,000

LEVEL 1

1,621

27%

LEVEL 2

2,351

39%

LEVEL 3

1,424

24%

LEVEL 4

604

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,479
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,085

LEVEL 1

1,544

25%

LEVEL 2

2,062

34%

LEVEL 3

1,647

27%

LEVEL 4

832

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,507
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,441

LEVEL 1

2,576

40%

LEVEL 2

2,358

37%

LEVEL 3

1,178

18%

LEVEL 4

329

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,841
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,492

LEVEL 1

2,502

39%

LEVEL 2

2,149

33%

LEVEL 3

1,328

20%

LEVEL 4

513

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

33

30%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

55
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

408
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 744

LEVEL 1

118

16%

LEVEL 2

218

29%

LEVEL 3

233

31%

LEVEL 4

175

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

472
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

128

17%

LEVEL 2

159

21%

LEVEL 3

247

33%

LEVEL 4

225

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

336
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

169

22%

LEVEL 2

263

34%

LEVEL 3

233

30%

LEVEL 4

103

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

347
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

208

27%

LEVEL 2

227

29%

LEVEL 3

209

27%

LEVEL 4

138

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

625
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,690

LEVEL 1

1,071

40%

LEVEL 2

994

37%

LEVEL 3

486

18%

LEVEL 4

139

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

699
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,587

LEVEL 1

936

36%

LEVEL 2

952

37%

LEVEL 3

514

20%

LEVEL 4

185

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,124
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,093

LEVEL 1

2,791

34%

LEVEL 2

3,178

39%

LEVEL 3

1,627

20%

LEVEL 4

497

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,726
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,267

LEVEL 1

2,724

33%

LEVEL 2

2,817

34%

LEVEL 3

1,957

24%

LEVEL 4

769

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,274
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,972

LEVEL 1

2,011

22%

LEVEL 2

3,687

41%

LEVEL 3

2,373

26%

LEVEL 4

901

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,908
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,009

LEVEL 1

1,975

22%

LEVEL 2

3,126

35%

LEVEL 3

2,629

29%

LEVEL 4

1,279

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

261
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,469

LEVEL 1

2,186

63%

LEVEL 2

1,022

29%

LEVEL 3

229

7%

LEVEL 4

32

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

412
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,568

LEVEL 1

2,071

58%

LEVEL 2

1,085

30%

LEVEL 3

346

10%

LEVEL 4

66

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,464
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,993

LEVEL 1

3,200

29%

LEVEL 2

4,329

39%

LEVEL 3

2,534

23%

LEVEL 4

930

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,211
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,962

LEVEL 1

2,951

27%

LEVEL 2

3,800

35%

LEVEL 3

2,874

26%

LEVEL 4

1,337

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,448

LEVEL 1

997

69%

LEVEL 2

380

26%

LEVEL 3

68

5%

LEVEL 4

3

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

109
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,615

LEVEL 1

1,095

68%

LEVEL 2

411

25%

LEVEL 3

101

6%

LEVEL 4

8

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

905
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,394

LEVEL 1

645

27%

LEVEL 2

844

35%

LEVEL 3

611

26%

LEVEL 4

294

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

915
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,840

LEVEL 1

377

20%

LEVEL 2

548

30%

LEVEL 3

555

30%

LEVEL 4

360

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,630
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,047

LEVEL 1

3,552

35%

LEVEL 2

3,865

38%

LEVEL 3

1,991

20%

LEVEL 4

639

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,405
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,737

LEVEL 1

3,669

34%

LEVEL 2

3,663

34%

LEVEL 3

2,420

23%

LEVEL 4

985

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.