Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 54 BOOKER T WASHINGTON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

725
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

30

4%

LEVEL 2

55

7%

LEVEL 3

234

29%

LEVEL 4

491

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

744
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 818

LEVEL 1

29

4%

LEVEL 2

45

6%

LEVEL 3

165

20%

LEVEL 4

579

71%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

354
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

23

6%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

253

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

393
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

15

4%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

325

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

371
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

32

7%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

238

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

351
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

30

7%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

254

63%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

63
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

49

75%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

93
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

64

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

95
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

78

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

482
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

32

6%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

335

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

464
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

17

4%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

363

75%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

13

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

45

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

65

58%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

701
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

37

5%

LEVEL 3

219

30%

LEVEL 4

482

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

716
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

24

3%

LEVEL 3

152

21%

LEVEL 4

564

76%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

29

41%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

725
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 801

LEVEL 1

23

3%

LEVEL 2

53

7%

LEVEL 3

234

29%

LEVEL 4

491

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

743
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 812

LEVEL 1

26

3%

LEVEL 2

43

5%

LEVEL 3

164

20%

LEVEL 4

579

71%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

669
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

39

5%

LEVEL 3

206

29%

LEVEL 4

463

65%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

616
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

3

0%

LEVEL 2

19

3%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

487

76%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

28

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

92

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.