Skip to Content
Main content

PS 87 WILLIAM SHERMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

55

14%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

155

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

165

42%

LEVEL 4

162

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

93

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

91

44%

LEVEL 4

90

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

90

48%

LEVEL 4

62

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

72

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

38
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

20

49%

LEVEL 4

18

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

13

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

205
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

106

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

110

43%

LEVEL 4

112

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

129

43%

LEVEL 4

139

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

131

42%

LEVEL 4

148

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

48
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

34

40%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

53

14%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

155

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

326
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

53

14%

LEVEL 3

164

42%

LEVEL 4

162

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

289
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

47

14%

LEVEL 3

138

40%

LEVEL 4

151

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

298
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

48

14%

LEVEL 3

146

41%

LEVEL 4

152

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

19

44%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.