Skip to Content
Main content

MS 255 SALK SCHOOL OF SCIENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

295

76%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

257

68%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

188

83%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

2%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

177

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

107

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

55

36%

LEVEL 4

80

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

28

90%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

27

82%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

61

85%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

45

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

174

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

155

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

8

89%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

24

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

22

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

281

85%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

237

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

26

41%

LEVEL 4

20

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

324
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

5%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

266

77%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

322
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

237

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

29

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

20

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.