Skip to Content
Main content

PS 6 LILLIE D BLAKE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

49

15%

LEVEL 3

125

38%

LEVEL 4

148

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

24

8%

LEVEL 3

117

39%

LEVEL 4

156

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

94

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

81

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

84

47%

LEVEL 4

54

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

67

41%

LEVEL 4

75

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

24

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

25

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

39

16%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

103

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

94

41%

LEVEL 4

118

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

10

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

143

54%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

6%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

141

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

30

45%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

27

50%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

272
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

124

38%

LEVEL 4

148

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

140

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

104

39%

LEVEL 4

142

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

14

44%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.