Skip to Content
Main content

HOWITT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

50

31%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

42

25%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

36

51%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

33

67%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

67

23%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

16

89%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.