ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

121

24%

LEVEL 2

188

37%

LEVEL 3

138

27%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

119

24%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

140

28%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

115

24%

LEVEL 2

181

38%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

131

28%

LEVEL 4

72

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

134

32%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

53

61%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

55

68%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

71

36%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.