CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

161

32%

LEVEL 3

194

39%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

179

36%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

112

45%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

88

35%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

255
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

153

32%

LEVEL 3

182

39%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

153

32%

LEVEL 3

171

36%

LEVEL 4

92

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

191

42%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

175

39%

LEVEL 4

96

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

27

60%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

164

43%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

154

39%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

29

28%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.