WAYLAND-COHOCTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

139

29%

LEVEL 2

175

36%

LEVEL 3

121

25%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

112

22%

LEVEL 2

176

35%

LEVEL 3

138

28%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

85

34%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

74

30%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

136

29%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

106

22%

LEVEL 2

174

36%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

89

21%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

134

31%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

50

78%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

102

37%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.