Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

131

37%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

72

42%

LEVEL 4

32

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

82

47%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

124

36%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

122

42%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

22

40%

LEVEL 2

27

49%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

29

46%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

72

43%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.