Skip to Content
Main content

BRUSHTON-MOIRA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

146

42%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

43

45%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

89

44%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

56

34%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

115

41%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

34

81%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

52

76%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

136

42%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.