MALONE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

158

42%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

95

48%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

151

42%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

132

39%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

29

85%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

108

57%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

81

49%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

90
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

155

42%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

101
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.