ORCHARD PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

684
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,325

LEVEL 1

165

12%

LEVEL 2

476

36%

LEVEL 3

455

34%

LEVEL 4

229

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

822
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,353

LEVEL 1

139

10%

LEVEL 2

392

29%

LEVEL 3

550

41%

LEVEL 4

272

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

384
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

61

9%

LEVEL 2

198

31%

LEVEL 3

243

38%

LEVEL 4

141

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

464
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

38

6%

LEVEL 2

156

24%

LEVEL 3

291

44%

LEVEL 4

173

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

300
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

104

15%

LEVEL 2

278

41%

LEVEL 3

212

31%

LEVEL 4

88

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

358
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

236

34%

LEVEL 3

259

37%

LEVEL 4

99

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

16

52%

LEVEL 4

10

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

627
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,225

LEVEL 1

146

12%

LEVEL 2

452

37%

LEVEL 3

423

35%

LEVEL 4

204

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

746
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,244

LEVEL 1

125

10%

LEVEL 2

373

30%

LEVEL 3

501

40%

LEVEL 4

245

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

19

53%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

661
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,149

LEVEL 1

76

7%

LEVEL 2

412

36%

LEVEL 3

437

38%

LEVEL 4

224

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

792
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,170

LEVEL 1

59

5%

LEVEL 2

319

27%

LEVEL 3

524

45%

LEVEL 4

268

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

821
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,348

LEVEL 1

136

10%

LEVEL 2

391

29%

LEVEL 3

550

41%

LEVEL 4

271

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

633
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,179

LEVEL 1

110

9%

LEVEL 2

436

37%

LEVEL 3

412

35%

LEVEL 4

221

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

739
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,157

LEVEL 1

89

8%

LEVEL 2

329

28%

LEVEL 3

490

42%

LEVEL 4

249

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

55

38%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.