Skip to Content
Main content

HARRIS HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

118

53%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

33

40%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

55

54%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

44

42%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

63

53%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

108

58%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

77

48%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

115

62%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

68

45%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

105

60%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.