Skip to Content
Main content

CASSADAGA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

99

28%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

90

27%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

116

43%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

42

78%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

79

43%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.