MORAVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

131

30%

LEVEL 2

170

40%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

148

34%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

85

38%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

126

31%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

114

28%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

59

69%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

52

66%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

72

37%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

95

40%

LEVEL 2

105

44%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

91

38%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.