LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

228

46%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

124

23%

LEVEL 2

190

35%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

135

51%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

74

27%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

26

50%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

151

43%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

22

63%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

214

49%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

46

77%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

162

44%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

44

35%

LEVEL 2

66

52%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.