BACCALAUREATE SCHOOL-GLOBAL ED GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

0%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

158

73%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

156

86%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

87

78%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

97

89%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

71

68%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

59

82%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

12

92%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

113
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

84

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

91
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

78

86%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

40

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

45

87%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

19

73%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

19

83%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

107

76%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

100

85%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

51

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

56

88%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.