Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL III GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

93

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

85

42%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

64

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

71

47%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

98

33%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

119

40%

LEVEL 4

90

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

24

41%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

142

42%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

93

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

142

43%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

85

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.