Skip to Content
Main content

MUSCOTA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

52

49%

LEVEL 4

28

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

45

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

27

47%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

30

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

25

51%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

27

49%

LEVEL 4

15

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

29

63%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

25

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

27

44%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

47

51%

LEVEL 4

28

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

43

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

49

42%

LEVEL 4

45

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

40

51%

LEVEL 4

23

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

36

44%

LEVEL 4

35

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.