GIRLS PREP CHARTER SCH-BRONX GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

176

36%

LEVEL 3

189

39%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

210

45%

LEVEL 4

99

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

70

39%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

107
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

116

38%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

195
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

136

46%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

171

44%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

177

48%

LEVEL 4

98

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

36

37%

LEVEL 2

42

43%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

47

46%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

240
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

187

39%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

304
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

205

45%

LEVEL 4

99

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

31

41%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

30

49%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

158

38%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

262
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

180

44%

LEVEL 4

82

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.