RIVERTON STREET CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

85

16%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

193

34%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

95

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

169
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

111

38%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

212
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

189

40%

LEVEL 3

163

34%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

273
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

186

36%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

176

40%

LEVEL 3

169

38%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

192

39%

LEVEL 4

94

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

37

49%

LEVEL 2

31

41%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

37

46%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

46

46%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.