Skip to Content
Main content

CANARSIE ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

93

44%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

154

47%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

50

51%

LEVEL 4

25

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

79

47%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

43

39%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

75

47%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

123
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

83

44%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

213
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

143

47%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

82

47%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

138

49%

LEVEL 4

71

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

16

32%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

49

44%

LEVEL 4

30

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

87

44%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

105

48%

LEVEL 4

47

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.