ESSEX COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

636
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,475

LEVEL 1

326

22%

LEVEL 2

513

35%

LEVEL 3

460

31%

LEVEL 4

176

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

608
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,489

LEVEL 1

389

26%

LEVEL 2

492

33%

LEVEL 3

429

29%

LEVEL 4

179

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

376
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 712

LEVEL 1

103

14%

LEVEL 2

233

33%

LEVEL 3

271

38%

LEVEL 4

105

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

352
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

152

21%

LEVEL 2

228

31%

LEVEL 3

230

31%

LEVEL 4

122

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 763

LEVEL 1

223

29%

LEVEL 2

280

37%

LEVEL 3

189

25%

LEVEL 4

71

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

256
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

237

31%

LEVEL 2

264

35%

LEVEL 3

199

26%

LEVEL 4

57

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

615
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,426

LEVEL 1

314

22%

LEVEL 2

497

35%

LEVEL 3

445

31%

LEVEL 4

170

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

595
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,446

LEVEL 1

376

26%

LEVEL 2

475

33%

LEVEL 3

422

29%

LEVEL 4

173

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

602
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,174

LEVEL 1

160

14%

LEVEL 2

412

35%

LEVEL 3

429

37%

LEVEL 4

173

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

572
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,174

LEVEL 1

200

17%

LEVEL 2

402

34%

LEVEL 3

395

34%

LEVEL 4

177

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

166

55%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

189

60%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

388
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

111

15%

LEVEL 2

230

32%

LEVEL 3

259

36%

LEVEL 4

129

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

361
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

122

18%

LEVEL 2

210

30%

LEVEL 3

243

35%

LEVEL 4

118

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

215

29%

LEVEL 2

283

38%

LEVEL 3

201

27%

LEVEL 4

47

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 796

LEVEL 1

267

34%

LEVEL 2

282

35%

LEVEL 3

186

23%

LEVEL 4

61

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

606
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,483

LEVEL 1

386

26%

LEVEL 2

491

33%

LEVEL 3

427

29%

LEVEL 4

179

12%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

634
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,467

LEVEL 1

324

22%

LEVEL 2

509

35%

LEVEL 3

458

31%

LEVEL 4

176

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

608
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,482

LEVEL 1

386

26%

LEVEL 2

488

33%

LEVEL 3

429

29%

LEVEL 4

179

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.