SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

183

25%

LEVEL 2

256

35%

LEVEL 3

223

30%

LEVEL 4

77

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

181

24%

LEVEL 2

262

35%

LEVEL 3

197

26%

LEVEL 4

106

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

56

16%

LEVEL 2

134

39%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

127

32%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

116

30%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

13

38%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

273
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

173

26%

LEVEL 2

228

34%

LEVEL 3

209

31%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

163

24%

LEVEL 2

245

36%

LEVEL 3

174

26%

LEVEL 4

94

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

107

17%

LEVEL 2

222

36%

LEVEL 3

217

35%

LEVEL 4

76

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

108

17%

LEVEL 2

234

37%

LEVEL 3

193

30%

LEVEL 4

106

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

76

65%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

73

70%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

128

37%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

130

31%

LEVEL 2

154

37%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

298
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 726

LEVEL 1

175

24%

LEVEL 2

253

35%

LEVEL 3

221

30%

LEVEL 4

77

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.