DANSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

180

32%

LEVEL 2

198

35%

LEVEL 3

140

25%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

191

36%

LEVEL 2

170

32%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

88

34%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

103

38%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

165

31%

LEVEL 2

185

35%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

178

36%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

121

24%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

130

27%

LEVEL 2

180

37%

LEVEL 3

139

28%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

153

32%

LEVEL 2

151

32%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

50

72%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

38

67%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

129

42%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

120

43%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

178
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

176

32%

LEVEL 2

195

36%

LEVEL 3

138

25%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.