GORHAM-MIDDLESEX CSD (MARCUS WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

149

34%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

86

39%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

146

34%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

47

61%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

60

70%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

97

41%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

105

27%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

139

33%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.