LIVONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

107

19%

LEVEL 2

158

28%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

119

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

97

17%

LEVEL 2

171

31%

LEVEL 3

177

32%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

73

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

284
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

98

19%

LEVEL 2

145

28%

LEVEL 3

167

32%

LEVEL 4

117

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

276
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

88

17%

LEVEL 2

156

30%

LEVEL 3

168

32%

LEVEL 4

108

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

139

28%

LEVEL 3

173

35%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

156

31%

LEVEL 3

176

35%

LEVEL 4

110

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

37

63%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

39

71%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

49

14%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

99

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

128

37%

LEVEL 4

91

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

284
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

170

31%

LEVEL 3

176

32%

LEVEL 4

108

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.