BATAVIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

199

34%

LEVEL 2

150

26%

LEVEL 3

145

25%

LEVEL 4

88

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

192

34%

LEVEL 2

151

27%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

72

26%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

127

42%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

79

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

124

29%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

40

50%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

147

29%

LEVEL 2

133

26%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

86

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

140

28%

LEVEL 2

138

28%

LEVEL 3

128

26%

LEVEL 4

89

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

52

69%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

52

73%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

223
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

185

33%

LEVEL 2

149

27%

LEVEL 3

132

24%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

61

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

152

44%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

152

44%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

233
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

190

33%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

145

25%

LEVEL 4

88

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

220
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

182

33%

LEVEL 2

148

27%

LEVEL 3

129

23%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.