Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN KENNEDY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

121

36%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

102

41%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

21

70%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

119

40%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

26

74%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

142
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

56

44%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

65

54%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.