Skip to Content
Main content

TWELVE CORNERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

517
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 762

LEVEL 1

70

9%

LEVEL 2

175

23%

LEVEL 3

274

36%

LEVEL 4

243

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

558
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

66

8%

LEVEL 2

176

22%

LEVEL 3

280

35%

LEVEL 4

278

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

283
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

140

37%

LEVEL 4

143

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

307
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

152

38%

LEVEL 4

155

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

234
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

100

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

251
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

123

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

47
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

26

43%

LEVEL 4

21

34%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

53
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

28

42%

LEVEL 4

25

37%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

31

35%

LEVEL 4

34

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

28

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

371
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

116

22%

LEVEL 3

196

37%

LEVEL 4

175

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

397
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

112

21%

LEVEL 3

198

36%

LEVEL 4

199

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

493
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 682

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

148

22%

LEVEL 3

260

38%

LEVEL 4

233

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

532
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

150

21%

LEVEL 3

262

36%

LEVEL 4

270

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

517
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 748

LEVEL 1

60

8%

LEVEL 2

171

23%

LEVEL 3

274

37%

LEVEL 4

243

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

557
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 781

LEVEL 1

55

7%

LEVEL 2

169

22%

LEVEL 3

279

36%

LEVEL 4

278

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

471
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

131

20%

LEVEL 3

243

38%

LEVEL 4

228

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

483
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

35

5%

LEVEL 2

125

19%

LEVEL 3

239

37%

LEVEL 4

244

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.