Skip to Content
Main content

ROGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

99

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

94

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

54

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

45

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

72

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

75

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

16

32%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

91

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

194
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

99

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

67

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

67

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

47

34%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.