Skip to Content
Main content

A M COSGROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

75

16%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

86

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

74

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

117

27%

LEVEL 3

152

35%

LEVEL 4

110

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

263
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

69

15%

LEVEL 2

124

27%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

110

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

60

43%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.