Skip to Content
Main content

MERTON WILLIAMS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

129

35%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

55

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

191
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.