HARLEM PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

185

36%

LEVEL 3

173

34%

LEVEL 4

52

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

88

18%

LEVEL 2

169

34%

LEVEL 3

182

37%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

110

43%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

56

23%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

117
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

125
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

104
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

161

39%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

163

42%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

47

46%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

47

44%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

88

18%

LEVEL 2

177

36%

LEVEL 3

170

35%

LEVEL 4

52

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

238
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

180

39%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

22

43%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

94

20%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

152

34%

LEVEL 3

163

36%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

199
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

88

20%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

152

35%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.