KIPP ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

129

25%

LEVEL 3

199

39%

LEVEL 4

126

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

205

40%

LEVEL 4

114

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

69

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

98

42%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

141
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

54

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

131
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

176
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

181
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

118

42%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

94

23%

LEVEL 3

177

43%

LEVEL 4

118

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

180

43%

LEVEL 4

109

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

319
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

112

23%

LEVEL 3

193

40%

LEVEL 4

126

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

305
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

191

40%

LEVEL 4

114

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

17

57%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

21

53%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

17

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

56

12%

LEVEL 2

123

26%

LEVEL 3

178

38%

LEVEL 4

114

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

187

41%

LEVEL 4

97

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

300
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

181

39%

LEVEL 4

119

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.