Skip to Content
Main content

PENN YAN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

132

26%

LEVEL 2

185

37%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

144

27%

LEVEL 2

205

38%

LEVEL 3

131

24%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

120

44%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

121

26%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

134

27%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

81

19%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

126

29%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

95

20%

LEVEL 2

186

40%

LEVEL 3

130

28%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

51

68%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

49

71%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

92

33%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

186
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

139

26%

LEVEL 2

203

38%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.