Skip to Content
Main content

MARTHA BROWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

102

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

52

12%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

159

36%

LEVEL 4

120

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

51

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

122

36%

LEVEL 4

94

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

248
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

110

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

101

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

154

38%

LEVEL 4

119

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

119

37%

LEVEL 4

89

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

113

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

26

35%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.