BAY TRAIL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

479
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

108

14%

LEVEL 2

191

25%

LEVEL 3

256

33%

LEVEL 4

223

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

468
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

105

13%

LEVEL 2

214

27%

LEVEL 3

251

32%

LEVEL 4

217

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

255
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

84

22%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

133

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

264
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

123

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

224
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

134

34%

LEVEL 4

90

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

94

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

15

47%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

11

35%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

13

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

412
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

77

12%

LEVEL 2

158

24%

LEVEL 3

216

33%

LEVEL 4

196

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

396
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

76

12%

LEVEL 2

166

26%

LEVEL 3

219

34%

LEVEL 4

177

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 725

LEVEL 1

76

10%

LEVEL 2

177

24%

LEVEL 3

250

34%

LEVEL 4

222

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

457
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

81

11%

LEVEL 2

201

27%

LEVEL 3

245

33%

LEVEL 4

212

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

32

60%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

467
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

101

13%

LEVEL 2

214

27%

LEVEL 3

250

32%

LEVEL 4

217

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

418
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

156

24%

LEVEL 3

220

34%

LEVEL 4

198

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

396
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

63

10%

LEVEL 2

175

28%

LEVEL 3

213

34%

LEVEL 4

183

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.