Skip to Content
Main content

EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS MICROSOCIETY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

141

38%

LEVEL 2

152

41%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

130

35%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

62

33%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

79

42%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

73

39%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

122

38%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

113

34%

LEVEL 2

140

42%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

83

25%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

28

68%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

28

70%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

129

44%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

53

66%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

49

68%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

146

40%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

122

35%

LEVEL 2

135

38%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.