Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 5 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

146

38%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

175

43%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

89

43%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

25

33%

LEVEL 2

32

43%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

32

50%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

29

45%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

107

34%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

51

75%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

68

77%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

124

35%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

150

40%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

126

39%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

133

46%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

144

38%

LEVEL 2

143

37%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.