SOMERS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

576
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,068

LEVEL 1

147

14%

LEVEL 2

345

32%

LEVEL 3

437

41%

LEVEL 4

139

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

562
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,053

LEVEL 1

153

15%

LEVEL 2

338

32%

LEVEL 3

398

38%

LEVEL 4

164

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

313
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

157

30%

LEVEL 3

223

43%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

301
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

49

10%

LEVEL 2

152

30%

LEVEL 3

203

40%

LEVEL 4

98

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

263
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

101

18%

LEVEL 2

188

34%

LEVEL 3

214

39%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

261
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

104

19%

LEVEL 2

186

34%

LEVEL 3

195

35%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

23

48%

LEVEL 4

12

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

21

45%

LEVEL 4

13

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

495
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 919

LEVEL 1

128

14%

LEVEL 2

296

32%

LEVEL 3

376

41%

LEVEL 4

119

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

468
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 885

LEVEL 1

132

15%

LEVEL 2

285

32%

LEVEL 3

335

38%

LEVEL 4

133

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

557
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 922

LEVEL 1

80

9%

LEVEL 2

285

31%

LEVEL 3

422

46%

LEVEL 4

135

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

546
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 899

LEVEL 1

74

8%

LEVEL 2

279

31%

LEVEL 3

385

43%

LEVEL 4

161

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

67

46%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

79

51%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

576
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,060

LEVEL 1

142

13%

LEVEL 2

342

32%

LEVEL 3

437

41%

LEVEL 4

139

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

561
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,044

LEVEL 1

148

14%

LEVEL 2

335

32%

LEVEL 3

397

38%

LEVEL 4

164

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

550
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 985

LEVEL 1

126

13%

LEVEL 2

309

31%

LEVEL 3

417

42%

LEVEL 4

133

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

523
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 957

LEVEL 1

127

13%

LEVEL 2

307

32%

LEVEL 3

365

38%

LEVEL 4

158

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

21

25%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

26

27%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

33

34%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.