Skip to Content
Main content

SCARSDALE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,738
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,077

LEVEL 1

52

3%

LEVEL 2

287

14%

LEVEL 3

897

43%

LEVEL 4

841

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,772
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,080

LEVEL 1

51

2%

LEVEL 2

257

12%

LEVEL 3

853

41%

LEVEL 4

919

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

865
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 986

LEVEL 1

15

2%

LEVEL 2

106

11%

LEVEL 3

402

41%

LEVEL 4

463

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

887
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,007

LEVEL 1

20

2%

LEVEL 2

100

10%

LEVEL 3

399

40%

LEVEL 4

488

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

873
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,091

LEVEL 1

37

3%

LEVEL 2

181

17%

LEVEL 3

495

45%

LEVEL 4

378

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

885
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,073

LEVEL 1

31

3%

LEVEL 2

157

15%

LEVEL 3

454

42%

LEVEL 4

431

40%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

107
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

51

39%

LEVEL 4

56

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

127
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

71

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

393
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

37

8%

LEVEL 3

170

39%

LEVEL 4

223

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

434
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

39

8%

LEVEL 3

165

34%

LEVEL 4

269

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,118
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,353

LEVEL 1

31

2%

LEVEL 2

204

15%

LEVEL 3

609

45%

LEVEL 4

509

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,094
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,302

LEVEL 1

39

3%

LEVEL 2

169

13%

LEVEL 3

574

44%

LEVEL 4

520

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

58

44%

LEVEL 4

48

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

52

40%

LEVEL 4

53

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,693
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,953

LEVEL 1

25

1%

LEVEL 2

235

12%

LEVEL 3

856

44%

LEVEL 4

837

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,721
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,947

LEVEL 1

23

1%

LEVEL 2

203

10%

LEVEL 3

812

42%

LEVEL 4

909

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

52

42%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

51
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,731
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,056

LEVEL 1

48

2%

LEVEL 2

277

13%

LEVEL 3

891

43%

LEVEL 4

840

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,768
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,061

LEVEL 1

46

2%

LEVEL 2

247

12%

LEVEL 3

849

41%

LEVEL 4

919

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.