Skip to Content
Main content

BLIND BROOK-RYE UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

399
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

142

25%

LEVEL 3

254

44%

LEVEL 4

145

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

118

19%

LEVEL 3

279

45%

LEVEL 4

171

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

211
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

120

43%

LEVEL 4

91

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

234
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

132

44%

LEVEL 4

102

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

134

45%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

216
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

147

47%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

17

43%

LEVEL 4

16

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

18

44%

LEVEL 4

16

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

22

55%

LEVEL 4

16

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

306
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

115

25%

LEVEL 3

204

45%

LEVEL 4

102

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

332
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

105

22%

LEVEL 3

208

44%

LEVEL 4

124

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

29

56%

LEVEL 4

14

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

124

23%

LEVEL 3

250

47%

LEVEL 4

144

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

439
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

99

18%

LEVEL 3

269

48%

LEVEL 4

170

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

27

47%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

445
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

116

19%

LEVEL 3

275

45%

LEVEL 4

170

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

396
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

137

24%

LEVEL 3

252

45%

LEVEL 4

144

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

443
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

113

19%

LEVEL 3

276

46%

LEVEL 4

167

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.