Skip to Content
Main content

RYE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

504
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

46

7%

LEVEL 2

129

19%

LEVEL 3

257

38%

LEVEL 4

247

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

507
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

118

18%

LEVEL 3

231

35%

LEVEL 4

276

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

257
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

140

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

238
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

146

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

247
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

107

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

269
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

72

19%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

130

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

29

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

32

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

433
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

109

19%

LEVEL 3

232

40%

LEVEL 4

201

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

430
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

203

36%

LEVEL 4

227

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

13

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

491
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

113

18%

LEVEL 3

247

39%

LEVEL 4

244

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

495
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

26

4%

LEVEL 2

97

16%

LEVEL 3

221

36%

LEVEL 4

274

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

23

44%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

21

41%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

503
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

42

6%

LEVEL 2

126

19%

LEVEL 3

256

38%

LEVEL 4

247

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

506
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

34

5%

LEVEL 2

116

18%

LEVEL 3

231

35%

LEVEL 4

275

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

498
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

124

19%

LEVEL 3

254

38%

LEVEL 4

244

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

499
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

111

17%

LEVEL 3

226

35%

LEVEL 4

273

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.