Skip to Content
Main content

RYE NECK UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

63

10%

LEVEL 2

154

24%

LEVEL 3

275

42%

LEVEL 4

163

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

411
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

70

11%

LEVEL 2

131

21%

LEVEL 3

229

37%

LEVEL 4

182

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

238
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

55

17%

LEVEL 3

145

46%

LEVEL 4

93

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

95

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

200
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

130

38%

LEVEL 4

70

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

202
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

87

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

16

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

18

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

22

49%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

25

51%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

300
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

86

21%

LEVEL 3

181

44%

LEVEL 4

119

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

276
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

71

19%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

127

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

51

39%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

432
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

135

22%

LEVEL 3

269

45%

LEVEL 4

163

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

112

20%

LEVEL 3

228

40%

LEVEL 4

181

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

27

52%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

27

56%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

435
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

54

8%

LEVEL 2

153

24%

LEVEL 3

272

42%

LEVEL 4

163

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

409
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

128

21%

LEVEL 3

227

38%

LEVEL 4

182

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

405
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

117

21%

LEVEL 3

249

44%

LEVEL 4

156

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

379
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

49

9%

LEVEL 2

98

19%

LEVEL 3

204

39%

LEVEL 4

175

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

37

43%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.